linux-kernel - Re: [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Fixing the Kernel Janitors project

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1212013125.2236.58.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Date:	Thu, 29 May 2008 01:18:45 +0300
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	ksummit-2008-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Fixing the Kernel Janitors project

On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 16:42 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> Appeals to be politer tend to only work in the short term (having given
> quite a few of them).  I think we're developing a root cause problem in
> the way we recruit people to work in the kernel and we have to think
> about fixing it there.

Do we really have a problem recruiting people to work in the kernel? On
what do you base that observation?

On a similar note, do we have any real data on the question of whether
those who are volunteering the patches which raise so much ire would
_ever_ become productive members of the team, even if we were to nurture
them properly?

-- 
dwmw2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/