[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080528225136.GA29014@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 15:51:36 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
ksummit-2008-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Fixing the Kernel Janitors project
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 05:35:27PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 01:18 +0300, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 16:42 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > Appeals to be politer tend to only work in the short term (having given
> > > quite a few of them). I think we're developing a root cause problem in
> > > the way we recruit people to work in the kernel and we have to think
> > > about fixing it there.
> >
> > Do we really have a problem recruiting people to work in the kernel? On
> > what do you base that observation?
>
> Yes, the median age of the MAINTAINERS is rising. Not quite at the rate
> of a year per year which would show we have practically no turn over,
> but it is rising.
My raw numbers show that the number of individual kernel contributors
continues to increase with every release, so this might not be as much
of a problem as it's made out to be.
> However, even if there were no recruitment problem at all, getting more
> people involved is always better because it means more contributions.
> And contributions (useful ones) are the lifeblood that moves the kernel
> forwards.
I agree.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists