[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <483D20F2.1010307@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 18:08:02 +0900
From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>,
Kosaki Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
MinChan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 04/16] free swap space on swap-in/activation
> @@ -1203,6 +1206,8 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned
> __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE, pgmoved);
> pgmoved = 0;
> spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> + if (vm_swap_full())
> + pagevec_swap_free(&pvec);
> __pagevec_release(&pvec);
> spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> }
> @@ -1212,6 +1217,8 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned
> __count_zone_vm_events(PGREFILL, zone, pgscanned);
> __count_vm_events(PGDEACTIVATE, pgdeactivate);
> spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> + if (vm_swap_full())
> + pagevec_swap_free(&pvec);
>
> pagevec_release(&pvec);
> }
I'm sorry if I misunderstand your patches, but is this part needed
after
[PATCH -mm 07/16] second chance replacement for anonymous pages
is applied?
After the patch, if shrink_active_list() is called about
anon pages(that is, with file=0), those pages should go to inactive list,
so they should not be removed from swap cache, should they?
Thanks,
Daisuke Nishimura.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists