linux-kernel - Re: [bug] stuck localhost TCP connections, v2.6.26-rc3+

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1211966834.12349.62.camel@twins>
Date:	Wed, 28 May 2008 11:27:14 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [bug] stuck localhost TCP connections, v2.6.26-rc3+

On Mon, 2008-05-26 at 13:56 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> in an overnight -tip testruns that is based on recent -git i got two 
> stuck TCP connections:
> 
> Active Internet connections (w/o servers)
> Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address               Foreign Address
> State      
> tcp        0 174592 10.0.1.14:58015             10.0.1.14:3632
> ESTABLISHED 
> tcp    72134      0 10.0.1.14:3632              10.0.1.14:58015
> ESTABLISHED 
> 
> on a previously reliable machine. That connection has been stuck for 9 
> hours so it does not time out, etc. - and the distcc run that goes over 
> that connection is stuck as well.
> 
> kernel config is attached.
> 
> in terms of debugging there's not much i can do i'm afraid. It's not 
> possible to get a tcpdump of this incident, given the extreme amount of 
> load these testboxes handle. This problem started sometime around rc3 
> and it occured on two boxes (on a laptop and on a desktop), both are SMP 
> Core2Duo based systems. I never saw this problem before on thousands of 
> similar bootups, so i'm 99.9% sure the bug is either new or became 
> easier to trigger.
> 
> It's not possible to bisect it as it needs up to 12 hours of heavy 
> workload to trigger. The incident happened about 5 times since the first 
> incident a couple of days ago - 4 times on one box and once on another 
> box. The first failing head i became aware of was 78b58e549a3098. (-tip 
> has other changes beyond -git but changes nothing in networking.)
> 
> One clue (which might or might not matter) is that distcc is one of the 
> very few applications that makes use of sendfile().

Just a quick note to say, me too!!

same scenario: distcc on localhost.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/