[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080529003657.GA17505@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 17:36:57 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
ksummit-2008-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Fixing the Kernel Janitors project
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 04:23:52PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > My raw numbers show that the number of individual kernel contributors
> > continues to increase with every release, so this might not be as much
> > of a problem as it's made out to be.
>
> That depends on whether we are gradually adding to the pool
> of developers, or seeing an increasing stream of newcomers
> who supply a patch or two before disappearing again.
>
> If you look at the list of contributors some old release for
> which we have good data (say 2.6.16). How many of those people
> contributed to each of the following releases? Does the
> decay curve look steeper or more gentle if you start from
> a more recent release?
I don't know, I haven't tracked the people individually that way, only
looked at the basic numbers of developers per release.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists