[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080529113406.5d8f75c4@core>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 11:34:06 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: "Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@...tmail.fm>
Cc: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>,
"kernel list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel" <dri-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: in-kernel DRM tree move around....
On Thu, 29 May 2008 11:05:08 +0200
"Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@...tmail.fm> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 May 2008 10:46:22 +1000, "Dave Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>
> said:
> > Hi,
> >
> > So I've been growing more annoyed with the current layout of the drm
> > tree in the kernel,
> >
> > a) it lives under char.
> > b) everything in one directory.
> > c) header files in one directory.
> > d) no header files exposed to userspace.
> >
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=7df9a948d0f849466e3de259cccb49bc54cbad68
> >
> > is a proposal to create drivers/gpu/drm, (I may move AGP in there as
> > well later). It also creates per-driver subdirs.
>
> Looks like a lot more suitable place! I just wonder if drivers/video/drm
> would be even more logical?
I think gpu is better - we are seeing various GPU as CPU accelerator
toolkits appearing and assuming the AMD one ends up open source we will
end up with gpu/something that isn't video.
Remember GPU = Grahi^WGeneric Processing Unit ;)
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists