linux-kernel - Re: m68k libc5 regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805291303030.6718@jikos.suse.cz>
Date:	Thu, 29 May 2008 13:03:55 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: m68k libc5 regression

On Tue, 27 May 2008, Jiri Kosina wrote:

> > So I bisected it to:
> > commit 4cc6028d4040f95cdb590a87db478b42b8be0508
> > Author: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
> > Date:   Wed Feb 6 22:39:44 2008 +0100
> >     brk: check the lower bound properly
> Indeed, this should take CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK into account. Does the patch 
> below fix it? (assuming that you have CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK=y):
> From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
> brk: check lower bound properly
[ ... ]

Geert, did you have time to verify that the patch fixes the problem for 
you please?

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/