linux-kernel - Re: Performance Characteristics of All Linux RAIDs (mdadm/bonnie++)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080529122223.462bf396@core>
Date:	Thu, 29 May 2008 12:22:23 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
Cc:	Jens Bäckman <jens.backman@...il.com>,
	Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
	xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: Performance Characteristics of All Linux RAIDs (mdadm/bonnie++)

> I really don't think that's any part of the issue, the same memory and 
> bridge went 4-5x faster in other read cases. The truth is that the 
> raid-1 performance is really bad, and it's the code causing it AFAIK. If 
> you track the actual io it seems to read one drive at a time, in order, 
> without overlap.

Make sure the readahead is set to be a fair bit over the stripe size if
you are doing bulk data tests for a single file. (Or indeed in the real
world for that specific case ;))

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/