lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080529125151.GA25124@Pilar.ictp.trieste.it>
Date:	Thu, 29 May 2008 09:51:51 -0300
From:	"Carlos R. Mafra" <crmafra2@...il.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
	npiggin@...e.de, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, jeremy@...p.org,
	mingo@...e.hu, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] on_each_cpu(): kill unused 'retry' parameter

Hi,

Just a naive comment/question:

> -	if (on_each_cpu(ipi_imb, NULL, 1, 1))
> +	if (on_each_cpu(ipi_imb, NULL, 1))

A few weeks ago I though about removing the second argument
from on_each_cpu, which is NULL more or less 70% of the time.

Do you think it is possible?
Have you already thought about it? 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ