[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080529131432.GA25627@Pilar.ictp.trieste.it>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 10:14:32 -0300
From: "Carlos R. Mafra" <crmafra2@...il.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
npiggin@...e.de, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, jeremy@...p.org,
mingo@...e.hu, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] on_each_cpu(): kill unused 'retry' parameter
On Thu 29.May'08 at 14:54:29 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, May 29 2008, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just a naive comment/question:
> >
> > > - if (on_each_cpu(ipi_imb, NULL, 1, 1))
> > > + if (on_each_cpu(ipi_imb, NULL, 1))
> >
> > A few weeks ago I though about removing the second argument
> > from on_each_cpu, which is NULL more or less 70% of the time.
> >
> > Do you think it is possible?
> > Have you already thought about it?
>
> It's the data argument to the function, I highly doubt you can get
> rid of that I'm afraid. on_each_cpu() is just a thin wrapper on
> top of smp_call_function() so that the caller doesn't have to
> care about manually calling on the local CPU. So as long as
> smp_call_function() has a data argument, on_each_cpu() should
> carry it as well.
>
> So nope, I don't think that's feasible (or even desired).
Ok, thanks for the reply!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists