[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1212080684.16984.30.camel@localhost>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 19:04:44 +0200
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Patch/RFC]: check CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS for
request/free_irq in interrupt.h
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 17:41 +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> I currently try to evaluate virtio_console for kvm on s390 and got
> the following problem:
>
> virtio_console uses hvc_alloc with irq=0. That means, register_irq
> and free_irq are never called by hvc_console.c, but the linker will
> still complain about unknown references to free_irq and request_irq.
>
> As the whole kernel/irq folder depends on CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS
> it seems consistent to declare all functions from kernel/irq only if
> CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS is set. Otherwise we can use empty functions.
>
> This patch does that for register_irq and free_irq.
>
> Comments?
Please don't. So far whenever the linker complained about the missing
register_irq/free_irq functions it has been a bug in a Kconfig file.
We should not silently accept code that requires the concept of an
irq-line when there is no such thing on a s390.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists