linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] libata: Handle bay devices in dock stations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080529175116.GE3375@khazad-dum.debian.net>
Date:	Thu, 29 May 2008 14:51:16 -0300
From:	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: Handle bay devices in dock stations

On Thu, 29 May 2008, Holger Macht wrote:
> On Thu 29. May - 15:49:34, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Got it. It works if I lose the ata_port_freeze() from 
> > ata_acpi_detach_device. 
> 
> Tejun, any idea? This is in for quite some time now. Maybe there's some
> involved...

<naivë question> Do we handle the possible fact that _EJ0 might want the
port (and maybe the device) to be active when it is called AND that _EJ0
might attempt to shutdown the port or the device itself?  </naivë
question>

Please ignore if it is something not even worth answering.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/