lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080529041207.GC8920@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 May 2008 21:12:07 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 2.6.26] Markers Use RCU sched

On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 09:04:57AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> rcu_barrier_sched and call_rcu_sched has been introduced in 2.6.26 for the
> Markers. Change the marker code to use them.
> 
> It can be seen as a fix since the marker code was using an ugly,
> temporary, #ifdef hack to work around CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU.

Looks good!

Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
> CC: Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ibm.com>
> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> ---
>  kernel/marker.c |   25 ++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/marker.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/kernel/marker.c	2008-05-27 05:32:09.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/marker.c	2008-05-27 05:34:22.000000000 -0400
> @@ -443,7 +443,7 @@
>  	hlist_del(&e->hlist);
>  	/* Make sure the call_rcu has been executed */
>  	if (e->rcu_pending)
> -		rcu_barrier();
> +		rcu_barrier_sched();
>  	kfree(e);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -478,7 +478,7 @@
>  	hlist_del(&(*entry)->hlist);
>  	/* Make sure the call_rcu has been executed */
>  	if ((*entry)->rcu_pending)
> -		rcu_barrier();
> +		rcu_barrier_sched();
>  	kfree(*entry);
>  	*entry = e;
>  	trace_mark(core_marker_format, "name %s format %s",
> @@ -657,7 +657,7 @@
>  	 * make sure it's executed now.
>  	 */
>  	if (entry->rcu_pending)
> -		rcu_barrier();
> +		rcu_barrier_sched();
>  	old = marker_entry_add_probe(entry, probe, probe_private);
>  	if (IS_ERR(old)) {
>  		ret = PTR_ERR(old);
> @@ -672,10 +672,7 @@
>  	entry->rcu_pending = 1;
>  	/* write rcu_pending before calling the RCU callback */
>  	smp_wmb();
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
> -	synchronize_sched();	/* Until we have the call_rcu_sched() */
> -#endif
> -	call_rcu(&entry->rcu, free_old_closure);
> +	call_rcu_sched(&entry->rcu, free_old_closure);
>  end:
>  	mutex_unlock(&markers_mutex);
>  	return ret;
> @@ -706,7 +703,7 @@
>  	if (!entry)
>  		goto end;
>  	if (entry->rcu_pending)
> -		rcu_barrier();
> +		rcu_barrier_sched();
>  	old = marker_entry_remove_probe(entry, probe, probe_private);
>  	mutex_unlock(&markers_mutex);
>  	marker_update_probes();		/* may update entry */
> @@ -718,10 +715,7 @@
>  	entry->rcu_pending = 1;
>  	/* write rcu_pending before calling the RCU callback */
>  	smp_wmb();
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
> -	synchronize_sched();	/* Until we have the call_rcu_sched() */
> -#endif
> -	call_rcu(&entry->rcu, free_old_closure);
> +	call_rcu_sched(&entry->rcu, free_old_closure);
>  	remove_marker(name);	/* Ignore busy error message */
>  	ret = 0;
>  end:
> @@ -788,7 +782,7 @@
>  		goto end;
>  	}
>  	if (entry->rcu_pending)
> -		rcu_barrier();
> +		rcu_barrier_sched();
>  	old = marker_entry_remove_probe(entry, NULL, probe_private);
>  	mutex_unlock(&markers_mutex);
>  	marker_update_probes();		/* may update entry */
> @@ -799,10 +793,7 @@
>  	entry->rcu_pending = 1;
>  	/* write rcu_pending before calling the RCU callback */
>  	smp_wmb();
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
> -	synchronize_sched();	/* Until we have the call_rcu_sched() */
> -#endif
> -	call_rcu(&entry->rcu, free_old_closure);
> +	call_rcu_sched(&entry->rcu, free_old_closure);
>  	remove_marker(entry->name);	/* Ignore busy error message */
>  end:
>  	mutex_unlock(&markers_mutex);
> 
> -- 
> Mathieu Desnoyers
> OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ