[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440805291355p5697c775k5f0beb8163688058@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 13:55:16 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Matthew Wilcox" <matthew@....cx>
Cc: "Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
"Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>, James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com,
ksummit-2008-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
"David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2008-discuss] RFC: Moving firmware blobs out of the kernel.
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 01:29:38PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> I very much would like to see a kernel-firmware or something tarbal that contains
>> a copy of all relevant "freely distributable" firmware, that users can just install
>> independent of the actual kernel version (and that kbuild would just pick up somehow).
>> That way we can deal with a lot more firmware without having to pollute the kernel / kernel release process
>> (after all, the timing is different in terms of releasing) while making it easy
>> to get the lot of it.
>
> There's definitely two schools of thought on this. Sometimes firmware
> changes (or adds) an interface. If the kernel driver has to accommodate
> new and old firmware, that adds complexity, and we all know that added
> complexity means more bugs. So I can definitely see some vendors
> wanting to distribute their firmware with the kernel.
>
driver should check fw version...
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists