linux-kernel - Re: [X86] Fix up silly i1586 boot message.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0805290102340.29522@cliff.in.clinika.pl>
Date:	Thu, 29 May 2008 01:10:53 +0100 (BST)
From:	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
cc:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [X86] Fix up silly i1586 boot message.

On Wed, 28 May 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> >  Hmm, 801586 should be fine as with Intel 80 used to stand for
> > microprocessors and 81586 would be confusing as I think 81 was used for
> > RAM devices (82 stood for peripherals, BTW).  My vote is for 80F86 though,
> > with "F" standing for "fast" as in the 74 TTL series. ;)
> > 
> 
> uname reports i686 on these chips.  The rest is ridiculous.

 Intel started it first with picking up a ridiculous number for the family
ID for the P4 line.  There is no technical justification for not keeping
these numbers consecutive.  Or keeping it at 6 actually if the P4 is meant
to be seen by software as the Pentium Pro and the rest of the P6 gang.

  Maciej
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/