[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1212098739.8888.58.camel@pasglop>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 08:05:39 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@...escale.com>
Cc: Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>, Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, scottwood@...escale.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: MMIO and gcc re-ordering issue
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 14:48 -0700, Trent Piepho wrote:
> I wrote a JTAG over gpio driver for the powerpc MPC8572DS platform. With the
> non-raw io accessors, the JTAG clock can run at almost ~9.5 MHz. Using raw
> versions (which I had to write since powerpc doesn't have any), the clock
> speed increases to about 28 MHz. So it can make a very significant different.
Yes, sync's can hurt a lot. This is why I initially tried to get more
relaxed semantics.
We could implement something like __ variants and do something that
would still have eieio's but not sync's for example (ie. MMIOs are still
ordered vs. each other but not vs. coherent memory).
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists