linux-kernel - Re: Performance Characteristics of All Linux RAIDs (mdadm/bonnie++)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 29 May 2008 08:37:42 +0200
From:	Michal Soltys <soltys@....info>
To:	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: Performance Characteristics of All Linux RAIDs (mdadm/bonnie++)

> 
> A very nice bit of work, my only questions is if you ever feel motivated 
> to repeat this test, it would be fun to do it with ext3 (or ext4) using 
> the stride= parameter. I did limited testing and it really seemed to 
> help, but nothing remotely as format as your test.
> 

Speaking about which, it would probably be good to adjust a little how 
the filesystem is created and mounted (both in xfs and ext3/4 cases). 
E.g. lazy-count=1 is still not the default last time I checked mkfs.xfs. 
And even ext4.txt from kernel documentation recommends mounting it with 
data=writeback,nobh when doing comparison with metadata journaling 
filesystems (the same would go for ext3).

Along with different journal sizes, keeping an eye on stripe & 
stripe-width, and other settings that might be of interest.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/