[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080529191211.080ec5cf.pj@sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 19:12:11 -0500
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: Max Krasnyanskiy <maxk@...lcomm.com>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, menage@...gle.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Give cpusets exclusive control over sched
domains (ie remove cpu_isolated_map)
Max wrote:
> btw I suppose you missed my reply.
I did not see your reply. Did you send it to me or lkml?
> Also Ingo at some point accepted a patch from Peter
> that partially removed the isolated map.
Reference? Did it remove the boot parameter isolcpus= ?
My concern is removing user visible features, without
good reason and careful consideration and some planning.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists