[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080530073607.GB7758@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 03:36:07 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, hch@...radead.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, neilb@...e.de
Subject: Re: [patch 4/8] nfsd: rename MAY_ flags
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 04:40:02PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > don't think it does, but I'm interested in the nfsd maintainers'
> > opinions.
>
> This isn't something I've ever had a reason to care about. What are you
> trying to fix exactly?
The NFS MAY_ flags operate in the same name and number space and we'd
easily get collisions when someone adds new MAY_ flags which miklos
as well as at least two other independent efforts want to do. To sort
this out we'd either defined the nfsd MAY_ flags in fs.h to make it
obvious we should not double-allocates bits or names, or use a different
name and number space for the nfsd flags. The first would be rather
trivial but also ugly, the seconds sound much better but is a little
more effort. Just defined NFSD_MAY_ and use it everywhere and do a
little translation inside nfsd_permission before passing it on to
permission().
>
> --b.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
---end quoted text---
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists