[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1212110870.15633.17.camel@pasglop>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 11:27:50 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
ksummit-2008-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2008-discuss] RFC: Moving firmware blobs out of the
kernel.
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 23:17 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > If the firmware has a compatible license and is required for critical
> > operations like booting the machine, built-in firmware should remain an
> > option. For certain embedded cases, I could certainly see that
> > in-kernel firmware being the best method for firmware distribution, for
> > both $Platform's users and $Platform's developers.
>
> I certainly agree, pushing more and more into initrd just annoys the
> hell out of me.
>
> I'd argue to include everything needed to build (and esp cross build) an
> initrd into the kernel - up until that point initrds are useless.
Us kernel hackers tend to like self-contained netbootable kernels
that have everything needed to boot a machine all the way to a shell
prompt :-)
David's proposal however do provides for storing the firmwares in
the kernel image, so I have no objection there.
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists