[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1212141059.12349.240.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 11:50:59 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
ksummit-2008-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2008-discuss] RFC: Moving firmware blobs out of the
kernel.
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 10:31 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 29 May 2008 16:39:48 -0700
> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>
> > Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > >
> > > I certainly agree, pushing more and more into initrd just annoys the
> > > hell out of me.
> > >
> > > I'd argue to include everything needed to build (and esp cross build) an
> > > initrd into the kernel - up until that point initrds are useless.
> > >
> >
> > I tried to push for that two years ago. I'd be more than happy to pull
> > that out of the freezer.
>
> Its kind of irrelevant if you need an initrd or not. The only question of
> relevance is "does it get built when I type make all". Almost all Linux
> users are using initrd without problem - because their distro ensures
> "make install" and the packaged kernels do the right thing.
Its my own convenience I'm serving here. I hardly ever do a local
install. And for the old machines a local build just isn't even an
option.
It's what benh said; I just want a single netbootable image. And cross
buildling initrds is just impossible - which makes the whole solution
useless.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists