[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0805292143001.26334-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 21:44:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
cc: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] USB fixes for 2.6.26-rc4
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 02:48:39PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 May 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> > > USB: EHCI: fix performance regression
> >
> > That's not a regresssion at all! Plus, this patch shouldn't
> > have included the timeout change. The timeout change is why
> > I didn't ACK this patch...
>
> Well, I was misinformed by Alan Stern about this then, sorry for missing
> that you didn't ack this one (you acked the other patches in this series
> though.)
The notion that this was a regression came about by mistake. It was
stated that 2.6.24 worked better than 2.6.25; apparently that remark
was wrong.
> Alan, care to make up a patch to fix this? Or should I just revert it
> in the tree as-is?
Given that the issues are not yet resolved among the developers, I
think reverting the patch for now is the best course.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists