linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function update_cpumask() and update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <483F6367.1040701@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Fri, 30 May 2008 10:16:07 +0800
From:	Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	menage@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function update_cpumask()
 and update_nodemask()

on 2008-5-30 9:53 Paul Jackson wrote:
> Miao wrote:
>> I think that it is unnecessary to change cpuset_cpus_allowed_locked()'s comment
>> because it isn't a static function, it is a extern function
> 
> Yes, you are correct.  My mistake.  Sorry.
> 

I check kernel/cpuset.c and find many static functions with "/**" comment.
So I want to remove the special commenting convention for them.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/