linux-kernel - EDAC i5000 MC0: NON-FATAL ERRORS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 30 May 2008 12:55:50 -0400
From:	Jack Howarth <howarth@...mo.msbb.uc.edu>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: EDAC i5000 MC0: NON-FATAL ERRORS

   I am seeing the following errors on a Fedora 7 x86_64 linux box,
running on a Tyan Tempest i5000XL motherboard, after upgrading from
kernel-2.6.25-14.fc9.x86_64 to kernel-2.6.25.3-18.fc9.x86_64...

May 25 04:30:56 fourier kernel: EDAC i5000 MC0: NON-FATAL ERRORS Found!!! 1st NON-FATAL Err Reg= 0x10000
May 25 04:30:56 fourier kernel: EDAC MC0: CE row 1, channel 0, label "": (Branch=0 DRAM-Bank=3 RDWR=Read RAS=14339 CAS=672, CE Err=0x10000)

These messages occur about once an hour and are always for the same DRAM-Bank.
I've not been able to find any memory errors when running memtest86 with or
without ECC checking being enabled. Are there any known issues with the
EDAC support in the kernel that might cause false positives like this?
The errors are always marked as non-fatal and are for reads. Also, does
anyone know how this code numbers ram banks? Is the first ram bank considered
0 or 1 by this code? Thanks in advance for any clarifications.
                    Jack
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/