| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 21:43:59 +0200 From: "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com> To: "Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@...redi.hu> Cc: drepper@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-man@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v3] Miklos, You omitted to answer my question, the last sentence below: On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com> wrote: > Miklos, > > I already fixed most of the isues with utimensat() in my previous > version of the patch several days back, and that patch (probably > still) applies against current mainline. [...] > This is a bug. It is one of *several* bugs in the original > implementation of the utimensat()/futimens() interface. All of them > should be fixed. I have by now provided fixes for most of them. (Not > point 2 above, but with a little help that should be quickly fixed as > well.) At this point, I think you need to explain why you think those > fixes shouldn't be applied. Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists