[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cfd18e0f0805301243h7d862963o8320a2c1f48942ce@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 21:43:59 +0200
From: "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>
To: "Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: drepper@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-man@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v3]
Miklos,
You omitted to answer my question, the last sentence below:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Michael Kerrisk
<mtk.manpages@...glemail.com> wrote:
> Miklos,
>
> I already fixed most of the isues with utimensat() in my previous
> version of the patch several days back, and that patch (probably
> still) applies against current mainline.
[...]
> This is a bug. It is one of *several* bugs in the original
> implementation of the utimensat()/futimens() interface. All of them
> should be fixed. I have by now provided fixes for most of them. (Not
> point 2 above, but with a little help that should be quickly fixed as
> well.) At this point, I think you need to explain why you think those
> fixes shouldn't be applied.
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists