[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1K2B2k-0002kS-Cz@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 22:17:42 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: mtk.manpages@...glemail.com
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, drepper@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-man@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v3]
Michael,
> You omitted to answer my question, the last sentence below:
Oh, come on. Where in my last mail did I say that these fixes
shouldn't be applied? I was only objecting to putting a fix and an
independent cleanup (which by now I realized was not such a good idea)
into a single patch.
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists