[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080530204307.GA4978@ucw.cz>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 22:43:08 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: sync_file_range(SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WRITE) blocks?
Hi!
> > sync_file_range(SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WRITE) blocks ... which makes problem
> > for s2disk: there we want to start writeout as early as possible
> > (system is going to shut down after write, and we need the data on
> > disk).
> >
> > Unfortuantely, sync_file_range(SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WRITE) blocks, which
> > does not work for us. Is there non-blocking variant? "Start writeout
> > on this fd, but don't block me"?
>
> I guess there are lots of reasons why it may block (get rescheduled)
> briefly, but why would that matter to you? Are you saying that its
> whole design has got broken somehow, and now SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WRITE
> is behaving as if SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WAIT_AFTER had been supplied too?
It appears to me like it includes WAIT_AFTER, yes.
I was not sure what the expected behaviour was... lets say we have a
lot of dirty data (like 40MB) and system with enough free memory. Is
it reasonable to expect SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WRITE to return pretty much
immediately? (like in less than 10msec)? Because it seems to take more
like a second here...
(Underlying 'file' is actually /dev/sda1 -- aka my swap partition, but
that should not matter --right?)
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists