linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.6.26-rc1 regression: ISA DMA broken (bisected)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 31 May 2008 00:11:37 +0200
From:	Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
CC:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ALSA devel <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.6.26-rc1 regression: ISA DMA broken (bisected)

On 30-05-08 23:43, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

> On Friday 30 May 2008 03:15:57 pm Rene Herman wrote:

>> It gets uglier. ALSA ISA drivers (for cards that exist both as legacy 
>> and as ISAPnP at least) keep a merged legacy/isapnp model; PnP is used 
>> mostly for initializing global variables that the same old legacy probe 
>> routines then reference. This means that beyond that global resource 
>> init step the specific struct device is no longer available. Without 
>> restructuring too many things really only fixable through other hacks 
>> again such as a global dma_dev[] array or some such.
>>
>>  From the viewpoint of PnP itself setting the dma_mask for a pnp_card (a 
>> pnp_dev collection) makes isolated sense so if no objections, I'll 
>> submit the attached after all. From the ALSA side we'd then pass the 
>> card dev (which we'd also do for isa_dev) and keep in mind that we might 
>> want to get more specific if over time structure permits it.
>>
>> struct snd_pcm already has its own struct device * which would be the 
>> right one here but it's setting that which gets ugly...
> 
> Looks good to me.  It does sound like a lot of work and possibly
> more risk than it's worth to fix up some of this stuff.

Fairly invasive at least. The good thing though is that with the recent 
pnp_manual_config_dev() removal the PnP drivers have no actual need/use 
for this global variable model anymore and now I have a great excuse for 
rewriting them. That can happen one at a time though...

> I do still wonder whether any non-x86 architectures need similar
> fixes in dma_alloc_coherent(), i.e., check for dev==NULL and fall
> back to a 24-bit DMA mask.

Hrmmpf. Good question. In sound/isa, we've had a but of alpha spottyness 
over time but nothing which would seem to be related.

> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>

Thanks. I'll assume Andrew picks it up from the CC...

Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/