linux-kernel - Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings for the week of May 30th 2008

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805301547040.3141@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 30 May 2008 15:55:25 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
cc:	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Subject: Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings for the week of May 30th 2008



On Fri, 30 May 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
> versions that do identify themselves as "2.6.25-14.fc9.i686.PAE", and 
> these ones didn't, (they're all in the "2.6.25-14.fc9.i686" form) so 
> this is a kernel without PAE.

Hmm. Every single one is that one kernel version or 2.6.25.3-18.fc9.i686, 
and with that many reports I'd have expected it from other kernels too. 
What was the previous popular fc9 kernel (I assume it was 2.6.25-based 
too?), and what changed?

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/