[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080530225032.GH1369@clifford.at>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 00:50:32 +0200
From: Clifford Wolf <clifford@...fford.at>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add rlimits to /proc/<PID>/status
Hi,
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:35:27PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> Aren't they better staying in /proc/<PID>/limits?
this was a cleanup of a patch I've sent to lkml about 6 months ago
when there was no yet-released (non-rc) kernel with /proc/<PID>/limits ...
my patch is a more or less duplicate of commit d85f50d5. oops.
please simply ignore it.. ;-)
yours,
- clifford
--
A byte walks into a bar and orders a pint. Bartender asks him "What's wrong?"
Byte says "Parity error." Bartender nods and says "Yeah, I thought you looked
a bit off."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists