[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080531101832.GA15170@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 12:18:32 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] x86: I/O APIC: Timer through 8259A second-chance
* Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@...ux-mips.org> wrote:
> Despite looking quite innocent, this is the most intrusive
> modification in the series. I tested this change (on top of all the
> other 14 ones) with as many variations of interrupt wiring
> configuration as I could imagine and simulate with my system. Of
> course my machine is perfectly unbroken, :) so chances are more exotic
> convolutions may have escaped my attention. Also I tested the 32-bit
> variation only. So again, I recommend a good amount of testing in the
> field before this patch is propagated upstream.
applied all 15 APIC patches of yours to tip/x86/apic, thanks Maciej!
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists