[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080531133547.10b5d7f6@core>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 13:35:47 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Michael Zappe <zapman@...erlan.net>,
Stephane Alnet <stephane@...icardie.fr>,
Brad Hards <bhards@...pond.net.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kaweth: use request_firmware()
> I was not late to the party. I was the first one using
> request_firmware() and always keeping an eye on drivers using it and
> making sure using it correctly. However drivers sneaked in without
> that I realized it. Mainly because I don't have that hardware and
> reviewing every single driver obviously never happened.
Nothing in the documentation says that it can't have a heirarchical name,
so naturally lots of people did it. They didn't sneak in - they improved
on the interface and evolved it. They did it in a way that didn't upset
anything else (which is why you didn't notice).
No sneaking involved.
> I repeatedly said that no hierarchical namespace should be used (and
> this was a couple of years ago) and now since some developers misuse
> it, it makes it right.
It means by consensus the developer community decided that a heirarchical
namespace was useful. And that is the party you've arrived late for.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists