linux-kernel - Re: CFD: linux-wanking@...r.kernel.org (was [PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080531162312.GA5599@tull.net>
Date:	Sun, 1 Jun 2008 02:23:13 +1000
From:	Nick Andrew <nick@...k-andrew.net>
To:	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Cc:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>, rdunlap@...otime.net,
	tytso@....edu, hch@...radead.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: CFD: linux-wanking@...r.kernel.org (was [PATCH] Standard	indentation of arguments)

Suggestions ...

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 01:46:28AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> Ok, here's a first (very) rough draft of a KernelNewbieGuide document.
> It can certainly be expanded a lot and my grammar and spelling is far
> from perfect, but hey, it's a first rough draft :)

[...]

> - Go through the kernel Bugzilla (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/) and see
> if you can fix any of the many bugs filed in it. There's a metric
> butload of bugs filed in there that need attention.

"buttload"

> As far as tools go, all you really need are the tools compile the
> kernel (gcc, make etc) and a text editor to edit the source - vi,
> emacs, joe, almost anything will do fine.

"tools _to_ compile the kernel"

> Developing against anything older than the latest stable kernel is
> likely to be a waste of effort due to the rapid pace of
> development. Once you finish your patch against a several months (or
> even weeks) old kernel, your patch runs a great risk of being obsolete
> or impossible to apply (this greatly depends on the area you work on
> ofcours cince some areas change more rapidly than others, but do try

"of course, since"

> If your patch did not get applied and you recieved an ACK or some

"received"

> criticism about your patch, then your job is easy. If there's a very
> explicit rejection of the patch by the maintainer of the code with a
> good reason, then don't bother sending it again, it probably will
> never be applied. If the patch received improvement suggestions or
> other review comments, then you should create a new version of your
> patch that adresses the feedback you get and then re-submit (it's
> usually a good idea to list what stuff you've adressed when
> re-submitting).

"addressed".

I'd probably make a few grammatical changes too. When you're happy
with the content and your document is in the tree, I'll submit a
patch :-)

Nick.
-- 
PGP Key ID = 0x418487E7                      http://www.nick-andrew.net/
PGP Key fingerprint = B3ED 6894 8E49 1770 C24A  67E3 6266 6EB9 4184 87E7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/