[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48409847.4000902@goop.org>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 01:13:59 +0100
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
kvm-devel <kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] mm+paravirt+xen: add pte read-modify-write abstraction
Zachary Amsden wrote:
> We don't fault. We write directly to the primary page tables, and clear
> the pte just like native. We just issue all mprotect updates in the
> queue, and flush the queue when leaving lazy mmu mode. You can't wait
> for the TLB flush, you must flush the updates before releasing the
> pagetable lock, or you could get misordered updates in an SMP system.
>
How do you track which ptes need shadow updates? Do you walk the entire
pagetable on tlb flush? Or just rebuild the shadow from scratch on demand?
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists