[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4840C29B.6030507@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 20:14:35 -0700
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mtk.manpages@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] 64-bit futexes: Intro
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> We've had a 32-bit rwsemaphore in the kernel for a *long* time.
You misread what I wrote.
Semaphores are fine. The problem are reader/writer locks where we need
three counters and some flags. It is absolutely not acceptable to limit
the number of threads to 512 to make this fit.
> I think it's totally stupid for glibc to even *try* to do something like
> this, since almost nobody will have a kernel with 64-bit futex support for
> a long time in the wild anyway. So you need to support a 32-bit semaphore
> in practice, and it's been done before.
Again, misread. This is not functionality which is not available.
Semaphores are *of course* fine with 32 bits. And there is a
reader/writer lock implementation. It is just very slow compared to
what is possible. The transition between systems miss the 64-bit
support and those which have it is completely transparent. The same
glibc binary will work for both.
- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkhAwpsACgkQ2ijCOnn/RHS7PACdGvdgI9pv+IcsSPkXPVwFJ5ZF
YNQAn01fm1wEc4EI/fwOVuM57XtCy9Dq
=LcpJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists