| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <cfd18e0f0805302228n63cbf0d6l6e7606690ded2315@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 07:28:54 +0200 From: "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com> To: "Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@...redi.hu> Cc: drepper@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-man@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v3] On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote: > Michael, > >> You omitted to answer my question, the last sentence below: > > Oh, come on. Where in my last mail did I say that these fixes > shouldn't be applied? I didn't say you did. However, while saying "I understand your frustration", you simply ignored this question, which I would say was fairly important in the context, and asked me to write another version of the patch against your tree. My takeaway from this is that you attach a higher priority to seeing that your tree isn't broken, than to seeing that these bugs get fixed. Cheers, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists