linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/7] mmc: at91_mci: update bytes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080601144439.GT5818@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 1 Jun 2008 15:44:39 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc:	Pierre Ossman <drzeus@...eus.cx>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
	Eric BENARD <ebenard@...e.fr>,
	ARM Linux Mailing List 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] mmc: at91_mci: update bytes_xfered value once xfer done

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 02:18:57PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Modify bytes_xfered value after a write.
> 
> That will report, as accurately as possible, the amount of 
> sectors that are effectively written.
> 
> This update introduces the check of the busy signal given by
> the card.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>

Doesn't this patch depend on patch 4?  IOW, shouldn't you be correcting
this before you enable the features which require this to be accurate?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/