linux-kernel - [PATCH][resend] rfcomm deadlock fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080601013410.GA3600@darkstar.domain.name>
Date:	Sun, 1 Jun 2008 09:34:10 +0800
From:	Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>
To:	davem@...emloft.net
Cc:	arjan@...ux.intel.com, marcel@...tmann.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][resend] rfcomm deadlock fix

There's logic in __rfcomm_dlc_close:
	rfcomm_dlc_lock(d);
	d->state = BT_CLOSED;
	d->state_changed(d, err);
	rfcomm_dlc_unlock(d);

In rfcomm_dev_state_change, it's possible that rfcomm_dev_put try to take the
dlc lock, then we will deadlock.

Here fixed it by unlock dlc before rfcomm_dev_get in rfcomm_dev_state_change.

why not unlock just before rfcomm_dev_put? it's because there's another problem.
rfcomm_dev_get/rfcomm_dev_del will take rfcomm_dev_lock, but in rfcomm_dev_add
the lock order is : rfcomm_dev_lock --> dlc lock

so I unlock dlc before the taken of rfcomm_dev_lock.

Actually it's a regression caused by commit
1905f6c736cb618e07eca0c96e60e3c024023428, the dlc state_change could be two
callbacks : rfcomm_sk_state_change and rfcomm_dev_state_change. I missed the rfcomm_sk_state_change that time.

Thanks Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com> for the effort in commit
4c8411f8c115def968820a4df6658ccfd55d7f1a
but he missed the rfcomm_dev_state_change lock issue.

Signed-off-by: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>

---
net/bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c |   13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -upr linux/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c linux.new/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c
--- linux/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c	2008-05-30 15:46:33.000000000 +0800
+++ linux.new/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c	2008-05-30 17:08:30.000000000 +0800
@@ -566,11 +566,22 @@ static void rfcomm_dev_state_change(stru
 	if (dlc->state == BT_CLOSED) {
 		if (!dev->tty) {
 			if (test_bit(RFCOMM_RELEASE_ONHUP, &dev->flags)) {
-				if (rfcomm_dev_get(dev->id) == NULL)
+				/* Drop DLC lock here to avoid deadlock
+				 * 1. rfcomm_dev_get will take rfcomm_dev_lock
+				 *    but in rfcomm_dev_add there's lock order:
+				 *    rfcomm_dev_lock -> dlc lock
+				 * 2. rfcomm_dev_put will deaklock if it's
+				 *    the last reference
+				 */
+				rfcomm_dlc_unlock(dlc);
+				if (rfcomm_dev_get(dev->id) == NULL) {
+					rfcomm_dlc_lock(dlc);
 					return;
+				}

 				rfcomm_dev_del(dev);
 				rfcomm_dev_put(dev);
+				rfcomm_dlc_lock(dlc);
 			}
 		} else
 			tty_hangup(dev->tty);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/