linux-kernel - Re: Diagnosing linux-next (Was: Re: m68k libc5 regression)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080601140415.a2f25b9d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:04:15 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Diagnosing linux-next (Was: Re: m68k libc5 regression)

On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 23:26:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
> 
> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:53:38 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > I do not know how to work out how this patch got into linux-next.
> 
> I have been wondering for a while what I can do to make figuring this out
> (in general) easier.  Would adding the SHA1 of the head of each tree to
> the Trees file help?  I could publish all the branches in my linux-next
> repo - but they change daily.  I guess only the git users benefit from
> those suggestions.
> 
> gitk can tell you pretty easily (just find the offending commit and work
> your way upward until you find a merge by me).
> 

hm, I just found the `committer' line in gitk.  Coulda sworn that
wasn't there yesterday.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/