linux-kernel - Re: Limits of the 965 chipset & 3 PCI-e cards/southbridge? ~774MiB/s peak for read, ~650MiB/s peak for write?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0806011723450.11366@p34.internal.lan>
Date:	Sun, 1 Jun 2008 17:26:43 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
To:	Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@...il.com>
cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Limits of the 965 chipset & 3 PCI-e cards/southbridge? ~774MiB/s
 peak for read, ~650MiB/s peak for write?



On Sun, 1 Jun 2008, Daniel J Blueman wrote:

> On 1 Jun, 10:50, Justin Piszcz <jpis...@...idpixels.com> wrote:
>> I have 12 enterprise-class seagate 1TiB disks on a 965 desktop board and
>> it appears I have hit the limit, if I were able to get the maximum speed
>> of all drives, ~70MiB/avg * 12 = 840MiB/s but it seems to stop aound 774
>> MiB/s (currently running badblocks on all drives)..
>
> Nice test. The Seagate 7200.11 drives deliver 120MB/s (outer zone,
> raw) each, and there is an issue with CFQ dispatching requests; see:
Thanks, wow...!

>
> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/b88264b084a2dfe0/a1bc0f67837bad00
>
> A quick workaround tweak is:
>
> # echo 0 >/sys/block/sda/queue/iosched/slice_idle
Unfortunately the disks have been removed from the host, only to test
to make sure all of them were good (1 was DOA).

>
> Does this help any? This gives the difference of ~68MB/s vs ~120MB/s
> on my 7200.11 ;-) .
>
> That said, the i965 chipset is fairly contemporary, but if that 2GB/s
> DMI connection is the bidirectional bandwidth (likely), then maybe
> you're hitting that limit: Intel's DMI bus is based on PCIe, thus will
> use 128 byte PCI-e Max Payload packets (as in the rest of the
> chipset), which IIRC theoretically maxes you out near 800MB/s.
Very interesting, do you know what AMD uses for their boards by any chance?
I'll most likely stick with some type of Intel chipset but was curious
regarding AMD/Nvidia.

>
> The X48 chipset may allow you to crank the Max Payload to 256 (setpci
> and the Intel chipset docs), if it doesn't default to 256, like in
> 5400 server chipsets. This chipset is where the fun really starts eg
> hdparm -T giving >10GB/s, like in Itanium2s ;-) .
Thanks for this information.  What kind of HW are you seeing > 10 GB/s? ;)

>
> Thanks,
>  Daniel
> -- 
> Daniel J Blueman
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/