[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200806012328.57577.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 23:28:57 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hch@....de
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/7] cramfs: allow unlinking of files
On Sunday 01 June 2008, Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Sat, 31 May 2008 17:20:16 +0200, arnd@...db.de wrote:
> >
> > +int cramfs_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
> > +{
> > + struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
> > + struct dentry *new;
> > +
> > + inode->i_ctime = dir->i_ctime = dir->i_mtime = CURRENT_TIME;
> > + drop_nlink(inode);
> > + new = d_alloc(dentry->d_parent, &dentry->d_name);
> > + d_add(new, NULL);
> > +
> > + dget(dentry);
>
> How is the negative dentry dropped on umount? Looks like we want a
> per-sb list to put them on. Then we can walk it and dput each one at
> umount time.
Good point. I think ramfs does exactly that, using kill_litter_super.
I haven't tested unmount so far, and should probably do something like
that in cramfs_put_super.
Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists