linux-kernel - Re: Limits of the 965 chipset & 3 PCI-e cards/southbridge? ~774MiB/s peak for read, ~650MiB/s peak for write?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0806010721230.10729@p34.internal.lan>
Date:	Sun, 1 Jun 2008 07:26:09 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
	xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: Limits of the 965 chipset & 3 PCI-e cards/southbridge? ~774MiB/s
 peak for read, ~650MiB/s peak for write?



On Sun, 1 Jun 2008, Justin Piszcz wrote:

>
> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
>> I have 12 enterprise-class seagate 1TiB disks on a 965 desktop board and it 
>> appears I have hit the limit, if I were able to get the maximum speed of 
>> all drives, ~70MiB/avg * 12 = 840MiB/s but it seems to stop aound 774 MiB/s 
>> (currently running badblocks on all drives)..
>
> Small correction, they are 7200.11 Seagate Desktop Drives (ST31000340AS), not 
> enterprise drives:
>
> http://www.seagate.com/ww/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=0732f141e7f43110VgnVCM100000f5ee0a0aRCRD
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822148274
>
>

http://www.intel.com/products/chipsets/g965/diagram.jpg

Basically it appears I am hammering the southbridge as for this board the 
PCI-e (x1) slots also traverse through the southbridge.

  6_SATA -> G965 ICH8
3_PCI-e -> G965 ICH8

>From which has to ship that data across the DMI (2GB) link to the 
northbridge.

If one utilized a 12, 16 or 24 port raid card (but used SW RAID) on the 
x16 slot on the northbridge itself, would this barrier exist as the:
GMCH<->CPU is (8.5GB/s)..?

Also on the X38 and X48 the speed increases slightly:
http://www.intel.com/products/chipsets/X38/X38_Block_Diagram.jpg (10.6GB/s)
http://www.intel.com/products/chipsets/x48/x48_block_diagram.jpg (12.8GB/s)

If one asks why would one need such speed?

Example:
LTO-4 drives can write at 120 MiB/s each:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_Tape-Open

It is then therefore imperative one could sustain this rate to possibly 
multiple(!) tape drives on a single system.

Justin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/