[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080531211306.GM5405@ucw.cz>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 23:13:06 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Amit K. Arora" <aarora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] Scaled statistics using APERF/MPERF in x86
Hi!
> > entitlement for the process as per the current CPU frequency. This
> > technique is used in powerpc architecture with the help of hardware
> > registers that accurately capture the entitlement.
> >
>
> there are some issues with this unfortunately, and these make it
> a very complex thing to do.
> Just to mention a few:
> 1) What if the BIOS no longer allows us to go to the max frequency for
> a period (for example as a result of overheating); with the approach
> above, the admin would THINK he can go faster, but he cannot in reality,
> so there's misleading information (the system looks half busy, while in
Plus time one-second-computation-job returning anything else is just
wrong. Even when it only happens when overheated... or only on battery
power.
If you want scaled utime, you need new interface.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists