linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ata: ahci: power off unused ports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4843C1E0.3080900@garzik.org>
Date:	Mon, 02 Jun 2008 05:48:16 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@...el.com>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: ahci: power off unused ports

Alan Cox wrote:
>> The key requirement is per-port control.  Ideally via hdparm or another 
>> userspace tool, but kernel command line (module options) or sysfs would 
>> be just fine too.  And agreed, the minimal you need is simply 1/0 for 
>> the port's policy.
> 
> We don't need it per port Jeff, you are being quite silly here. Right now
> its permanently foo=0 for all ports and nobody has suffered anything too
> horrible so being able to turn it off for all ports is clearly quite
> sufficient for the neat future.

Er, huh?  foo=0 means hotplug continues to work on the unused ports. 
Nobody has suffered because we default to enabling all the goodies.

	Jeff


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/