[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200806021204.16615.agruen@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 12:04:13 +0200
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
sds@...ho.nsa.gov, eparis@...hat.com, casey@...aufler-ca.com,
jjohansen@...e.de, penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 01/15] security: pass path to inode_create
On Monday 02 June 2008 11:13:41 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 09:02:14AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > So again, can you offer an alternative?
>
> Just give up on this dumb idea completely.
The AppArmor guys have really gone a long way in arguing their case, and all
discussions so far have ended in you decreeing that pathnames are bad at some
point. Thanks a lot for your constructive input on other areas of the code,
but could you please come up with technical arguments why pathnames are
bad this time?
Thanks a lot!
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists