[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080602101547.GD7459@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 12:15:47 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@...all.net>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Glauber Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.26-rc: x86: pci-dma.c: use __GFP_NO_OOM instead of
__GFP_NORETRY
* Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@...all.net> wrote:
> Okay, so how about this then ?
>
> --- linux-2.6.26-rc4.orig/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c 2008-05-26 20:08:11.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.26-rc4/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c 2008-05-28 10:27:41.000000000 +0200
> @@ -397,9 +397,6 @@
> if (dev->dma_mask == NULL)
> return NULL;
>
> - /* Don't invoke OOM killer */
> - gfp |= __GFP_NORETRY;
> -
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> /* Why <=? Even when the mask is smaller than 4GB it is often
> larger than 16MB and in this case we have a chance of
> @@ -410,7 +407,9 @@
> #endif
>
> again:
> - page = dma_alloc_pages(dev, gfp, get_order(size));
> + /* Don't invoke OOM killer or retry in lower 16MB DMA zone */
> + page = dma_alloc_pages(dev,
> + (gfp & GFP_DMA) ? gfp | __GFP_NORETRY : gfp, get_order(size));
> if (page == NULL)
> return NULL;
applied to tip/pci-for-jesse for more testing. Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists