[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0806021227470.6718@jikos.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 12:28:34 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: m68k libc5 regression
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
> >
> > brk: check lower bound properly
> >
> > The check in sys_brk() on minimum value the brk might have must take
> > CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK setting into account. When this option is turned on
> > (i.e. we support ancient legacy binaries, e.g. libc5-linked stuff), the
> > lower bound on brk value is mm->end_code, otherwise the brk start is
> > allowed to be arbitrarily shifted.
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Thanks a lot for verifying, Geert.
So, I assume the proper way to handle this now is you dropping it from
your m68k tree, and Andrew taking it through -mm.
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists