[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19f34abd0806020357w6478704dt50226f51c6c62701@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 12:57:07 +0200
From: "Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
To: "Alan Cox" <alan@...hat.com>
Cc: "Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"David Newall" <davidn@...idnewall.com>,
"Willy Tarreau" <w@....eu>,
"Harald Dunkel" <harald.dunkel@...nline.de>,
"Joe Peterson" <joe@...rush.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.25.3: su gets stuck for root
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 12:39:29PM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
>> Shouldn't it be EINTR to allow the signal to be processed and let the
>> process decide whether to retry the tcsetattr()?
>
> The signal is processed, and then application retries the tcsetattr and
> gets another one. The default TTOU behaviour is to block and then fg
> continues the call so RESTARTSYS is both correct and has been used for
> years
>
Hm, yes, that seems correct. I'm sorry for the wrong suggestions.
I guess this still doesn't explain why TTOU doesn't block (IOW, stop
the process, right?) in this case, because my test program does not
touch it.
Vegard
--
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists