linux-kernel - Re: [patch 01/15] security: pass path to inode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <84144f020806020404v430e63c6i71cafdda616a2512@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 2 Jun 2008 14:04:17 +0300
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc:	hch@...radead.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
	sds@...ho.nsa.gov, eparis@...hat.com, casey@...aufler-ca.com,
	agruen@...e.de, jjohansen@...e.de,
	penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 01/15] security: pass path to inode_create

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> You can argue against the concept of apparmor itself, but you better
> argue with Crispin, because I'm quite clueless about that part.  When
> you've convinced him (and Linus (and Ubuntu, and SUSE, and Mandriva))
> that apparmor is a stupid idea, then I'll give up.  Good luck with
> that!

But then I guess you can just by-pass the VFS maintainers and send
your patches directly to Andrew/Linus. Good luck with that! :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/