linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] msdos fs: remove unsettable atari option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:54:49 +0200
From:	Petr Stehlik <pstehlik@...hics.cz>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC:	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
	� <rene.scharfe@...fire.ath.cx>,
	Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] msdos fs: remove unsettable atari option

Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> Geert Uytterhoeven has a patch in his POSTPONED queue that is supposed
>>> to fix Atari FAT.  I can't speak to whether it works or why it's
>>> postponed, but it seems to compile.
>> I see. Although I don't know the patch, I'd like to add this part to
>> Geert's patch if possible. And when the patch can be posted, we can
>> re-add this part again.
>>
>> Geert, what do you think?
> 
> It's in POSTPONED state because nobody speaks up for/against it.
> Personally, I don't know how much it is (still) needed...
> But a few years ago somebody contacted me that he used it succesfully
> on PA-RISC and i386 ;-)
> 
> BTW, the patch is
> http://linux-m68k-cvs.ubb.ca/~geert/linux-m68k-patches-2.6/POSTPONED/134-atari-fat.diff
> 
> Atari people, I think now is the time to let it live or die...

The patch looks good, how can I let it live?

Petr

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/